Where all things constitutional are concerned including the Second Amendment, the United States Supreme Court is the arbiter of what is constitutional and what is not. Clinton’s notion that its stance on the Second Amendment is wrong exposes the fact that she holds the U.S. Constitution to be a flawed document, just as Barack Obama does.
As with everything that exposes her true agenda, Clinton made her remarks to high-value, big-money donors. She knows she could never say these draconian things from a public stage where she simply panders for votes. To expose her anti-Second Amendment stance would be to alienate some all-important undecided voters.
In her remarks, Clinton declared she would not only aggressively advocate for a permanent “assault weapons” ban, but she would also challenge the Supreme Court on other rulings including The District of Columbia v. Heller.
While Clinton has routinely stated she is “anti-gun violence” (one would have to travel far and wide to find anyone “pro-gun violence”), this is the first time she has stated she is willing to expend personal effort and the influence of the presidency to challenge the Judicial Branch over Second Amendment issues. Given that progressives, like Clinton, have a penchant for issuing unconstitutional executive orders, this is of serious concern.
“I was proud when my husband took [the National Rifle Association] on, and we were able to ban assault weapons, but he had to put a sunset on so 10 years later,” Clinton said. “Of course, [President George W.] Bush wouldn’t agree to reinstate them…We’ve got to go after this, and here again, the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment. And I am going to make that case every chance I get.”
Read more… Via: angrypatriotmovement.com